Regional
Technology Planning Guide
for North Carolina


Educational Consortia
The University of North Carolina
and
Instructional Technologies Division
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction

April 1997


Contents

Acknowledgments
Background Summary
Planning Guide
Framework
Sample Goals and Objectives
Technology Fund Usage
Lead Responsibilities of the Proposed Delivery Structure to Public School Educators
Deans' Council on Teacher Education
Appendices
  1. Strategy and Timeline for Developing and Implementing Assessments of Teachers' Essential and Advanced Skills in Technology Prior to Initial Licensure
  2. Technology Assessment Instrument for Basic Technology Skills
    Developed by E.T.G. (Educator Technology Group)
  3. Technology Assessment Instrument for Advanced Technology Skills
    Developed by E.T.G.


Acknowledgments

Charles Coble
Associate Vice President
UNC General Administration
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27515-2688

Elizabeth Long, Director
Public School Partnership
Appalachian State University
Boone, North Carolina 28608

Brad Sneeden, Director
Eastern North Carolina Consortium for
Assistance and Research in Education
East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina 27858

Lawrence Walker, Director
Central Carolina Consortium
North Carolina Central University
Durham, North Carolina 27707-3198

Robert Kanoy, Director
Center for Educational Leadership
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599

Shirley Farrar, Director
UNC Charlotte Education Consortium
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Charlotte, North Carolina 28223

Frances Jones, Director
Piedmont Triad Horizons Alliance
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Greensboro, North Carolina 27412

Eddie West, Director
Consortium for the Advancement
of Public Education
University of North Carolina at Wilmington
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-3297

Phil Monk, Director
Alliance of Business Leaders and Educators
Western Carolina University
Cullowhee, North Carolina 28723

Elsie Brumback, Director
Instructional Technologies Division
NC Department of Public Instruction
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2825

Margaret Bingham, Section Chief
Instructional Technologies Division
Planning and Integration Section
NC Department of Public Instruction
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2825

Alisa Chapman, Consultant
Instructional Technologies Division
Planning and Integration Section
NC Department of Public Instruction
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2825

Benny Hendrix, Consultant
Instructional Technologies Division
Planning and Integration Section
NC Department of Public Instruction
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2825

Camp Price, Consultant
Instructional Technologies Division
Planning and Integration Section
NC Department of Public Instruction
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2825

Sue Rogers, Consultant
Instructional Technologies Division
Planning and Integration Section
NC Department of Public Instruction
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-2825





NOTE: A special thanks to Alisa Chapman with the NC Department of Public Instruction for her extensive work on this document.

















"The faculty have been genuinely excited about the technologies that are available to them."

Steve Springer
ECU

Background Summary

North Carolina has demonstrated many leading efforts to support technology in education. These efforts have focused on the importance of instructional technologies in our public schools and in our university teacher preparation programs. These efforts are 1) the School Technology Commission and the North Carolina Instructional Technology Plan, 2) the School Technology Users Task Force; Technology Competencies for practicing educators and Instructional Technology Specialists, 3) the seven regional Educational Consortia (ASU - Public School Partnership, ECU - Eastern North Carolina Consortium for Assistance and Research in Education, NCCU - Central Carolina Consortium, UNC-Charlotte - UNC Charlotte Education Consortium, UNC-Greensboro - Piedmont Triad Horizons Alliance, UNC-Wilmington - Consortium for the Advancement of Public Education, WCU - Alliance of Business Leaders and Educators) and the educational consortium at UNC-Chapel Hill, and the 4) Assessment of Essential and Advanced Technology Skills for preservice teachers.

The School Technology Commission was created in 1994 by the General Assembly and charged with the responsibility to establish statewide requirements and guidelines for instructional technology in K-12 schools. The commission was to create an instructional technology plan for North Carolina that would require the development of Local Education Agency (LEA) plans, and to monitor and evaluate the state and local plans. As a result, all 117 LEAs now have a five-year instructional technology plan addressing curriculum integration, connectivity, collaboration, and staff development. The Department of Public Instruction (DPI) employs four Instructional Technology Consultants to assist school systems as they implement their local technology plans.

The Technology Users Task Force was appointed by the Education Cabinet (Superintendent of Public Instruction, President of the Community College System, and President of the UNC System) to develop a comprehensive plan for professional development in the area of technology. This plan was to target preservice and inservice teachers and administrators. A report issued by the Task Force in October 1995 outlined and identified the technical knowledge and skills deemed essential for all North Carolina educators. These skills are known as the Basic and Advanced Technology Competencies for Educators.

On March 14, 1996, the State Board of Education (SBE) endorsed the School Technology Users Task Force Report and approved the following recommendation for teacher license renewal: "During each five year cycle for license renewal, all North Carolina educators shall focus a portion of their training opportunities (three to five renewal credits) on Task Force recommended technology competencies, relevant to their licensure area, as deemed appropriate by their local school system." To determine licensure eligibility, a timeline of assessment for preservice teachers has been adopted by the SBE. Each of the fifteen schools of education in the University of North Carolina employ an Instructional Technology Specialist to support their faculty and future graduates in meeting the competencies.

The Educational Consortia are responsible for coordinating regional collaboration and planning with the community-at-large. As recommended by the Task Force, each of the consortia have hosted meetings within their region that brought together respective members of their organization to plan for technology professional development. These meetings included partners from business and industry, community colleges, LEAs, constituent institutions of the University, and private colleges. Summaries of these plans are available in a report entitled Implementation of Recommendations of The School Technology Users Task Force.

Most recently developed is the strategy and timeline for assessments of teachers' essential and advanced skills in technology prior to initial licensure, adopted by the State Board of Education on December 5, 1996. To assess essential technology skills, an Essential Technology Skills Inventory (ETSI) is being developed for administration to all institutions of higher education with teacher education programs. By 1998, Version D, the fourth version of the ETSI will be used as one criterion for initial licensing of all preservice teachers in North Carolina. Advanced technology skills will be assessed through a set of criteria developed by teams of University faculty, DPI staff, and public school teachers. Beginning in April 1998, graduates applying for initial licensure will be required to have demonstrated an acceptable level of mastery of the advanced technology competencies through displays of student work and through a preservice teacher portfolio.







"Our faculty are enthused about the humanizing of technology resources available to them."

Craig Kaml
ECSU

Planning Guide

The success of students and the future teaching workforce is dependent upon their ability to acquire the skills and knowledge demanded in a global information economy. Skills associated with job preparedness in such a high-tech environment suggest the need for increased access to instructional technologies. This can best be achieved by developing and implementing a plan for the professional development of teachers. Teachers must receive training if they are to use instructional technologies in the classroom.

The challenge is to create a technology plan that delivers high quality professional development; provides access to the appropriate tools; and promotes a reliable support structure through regional collaboration and partnerships. This guide seeks to serve as a template for developing a regional technology plan that will better prepare students for the 21st Century.

The following themes, at a minimum, should be addressed in a regional technology plan:


  • Professional Development

  • Access to Technology

  • Collaboration

"Through appropriate staff development for educators and sufficient access to the technology, students develop the skills needed to become productive citizens in the 21st Century"

Sue Rogers
NCDPI

Professional Development

  • Recognizing the responsibilities outlined in the Task Force Report, the adopted timeline of assessments of teachers' skills in technology, and the strengthening standards for student achievement and teacher performance, we must prepare our University faculty, current teaching workforce, and future graduates of teacher preparation programs to use technology effectively. Increasing expectations at all levels, K-12 through higher education, will help to move our teaching workforce forward. The Basic and Advanced Technology Competencies for Educators provides a skill base that will enable preservice and inservice teachers to effectively integrate technology into classroom instruction. Linking empowering technologies to the teacher's role for the full application of information and instructional technology into teacher preparation programs will offer learning experiences with and about technology.

Access to Technology

  • Professional development alone will not have a significant impact, unless there is equitable access to the technology. Greater sustained investments in hardware and software must be made to meet future needs, but increasing inventories is not all that defines access. To better define the term, human resources and services should be added. It is essential that highly trained professionals are available to work with faculty, teachers, and students as they learn more about the applications of technology to teaching and learning. As access increases there will be greater interaction between the teacher and the technology tools available.

Collaboration

  • Educational support structures are built on partnerships. By creating new partnerships and aligning existing ones to better serve public school teachers and administrators, we will increase student and teacher successes. The regional Educational Consortia are a means to create and build stronger support structures. They should serve as the common thread holding the regional technology plan together through collaborative efforts. However, to successfully implement the challenges laid out in a regional plan, it will take a coordinated effort from educational consortia, schools of education, community colleges, LEAs, and business and industry.


Framework

Goals and Objectives

  • Themes should be addressed through goals and objectives that are correlated to a timeline of implementation (see Sample Goals and Objectives). Goals should be attainable through measurable objectives and paced by a timeline of implementation. This will provide a fundamental framework for the evaluation of a regional technology plan.

Timeline

Funding Analysis

  • A funding analysis is an essential component of a detailed technology plan. It should include a source-of-funds schedule and planning assumptions that outline with precision where a region expects to get funding and how the funds will be expended (see Technology Fund Usage).

Evaluation

  • Each plan should include evaluative criteria to determine if the goals and objectives are being met. Surveys of the target population will help to guide the methods used in achieving the goals and objectives. The results can be used to tailor the necessary strategies to meet those needs (see Appendix B - Technology Assessment Instrument for Basic and Advanced Technology Skills).


Sample Goals and Objectives


Goals

Objectives

Timeline
  • Provide an environment to support public school teachers, administrators, university faculty, and preservice teachers as they learn more about the applications of technology to teaching and leaning.
  • Establish a schedule of professional development workshops that are aligned with the Basic and Advanced Technology Competencies for Educators.

  • Provide incentives, in the form of technology tools, for participation in staff development/technology training.
  • Fall 1997…
    Ongoing





  • Fall 1998…
    Ongoing
  • Build stronger partnerships with LEAs, community colleges, schools of education, and businesses so that we will be better prepared for the workforce needs of the 21st century.
  • Establish a list (available on the Internet) of the professional development opportunities offered by community colleges, schools of education and LEAs.

  • Models of effective professional development will be shared with public school teachers and administrators.

  • Establish a schedule to meet with regional business and industry for input on workforce preparedness and rapidly changing workforce needs.
  • 1st Session Summer School 1997…
    Ongoing


  • Fall 1997…
    Ongoing




  • Fall 1998…
    Ongoing
  • Increase teacher performance and student achievement by attaining and effectively using instructional technologies.
  • Infuse instructional technology into methods classes for preservice teachers.

  • Require basic technology skills to become a prerequisite for acceptance into teacher preparation programs.
  • Fall 1997…
    Ongoing



  • Fall 1998
    Ongoing


Technology Fund Usage


Budget Source/
Amount


Budget Purpose
(equipment, software, supplies, staff development, etc.)


Higher Education

State

Federal

Grant





Community College

State

Federal

Grant





Local Education Agency

State

Federal

Grant





Business and other private sources





Lead Responsibilities of the Proposed Delivery Structure
to Public School Educators


Application


Integration


Collaboration


Regional
Educational
Consortia
























P
u
b
l
i
c


S
c
h
o
o
l
s


Schools
of
Education

Community
Colleges


The University of North Carolina
Deans' Council on Teacher Education

Vision Statement

The University of North Carolina's schools, colleges and departments of education, in collaboration with public school partners and others, are committed to producing professional educators of the highest quality and to supporting their continued development on behalf of children in North Carolina.

Dr. Charles Duke
Reich College of Education
Appalachian State University
Boone, North Carolina 28608

Dr. Henry Peel
School of Education
East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina 27858-4353

Dr. Lois Green
Division of Education
Elizabeth City State University
Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909

Dr. Saundra Shorter
School of Education
Fayetteville State University
Fayetteville, North Carolina 28301

Dr. David Boger
School of Education
North Carolina A&T State University
Greensboro, North Carolina 27411

Dr. Sammie Campbell Parrish
School of Education
North Carolina Central University
Durham, North Carolina 27707-3198

Dr. Joan Michael
College of Education & Psychology
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, North Carolina 27695

Dr. Gwendolyn Henderson
Department of Education
University of North Carolina at Asheville
Asheville, North Carolina 28804-3299

Dr. William Burke
School of Education
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599

Dr. John M. Nagle
College of Education
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Charlotte, North Carolina 28223

Dr. Mary Olson
School of Education
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Greensboro, North Carolina 27412

Dr. Kathryn Sullivan
Department of Education
University of North Carolina at Pembroke
Pembroke, North Carolina 28372

Dr. Robert Tyndall
Watson School of Education
University of North Carolina at Wilmington
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403-3297

Dr. Gurney E. Chambers
College of Educ. and Allied Professions
Western Carolina University
Cullowhee, North Carolina 28723

Dr. Lelia Vickers
Division of Education
Winston-Salem State University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27110

Dr. Charles R. Coble
Academic Affairs Division
UNC General Administration
Chapel Hill, NC 27515-2688


Last Modified 7/3/97