|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Budget Request” because his report incorporated this document by reference. [Appendix E] The
|
|
|
|
committee’s recommendations are contained in the 12-page document.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Wilson directed the board to turn to page two and find the third line in the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
text that begins after the bullet points. In the line beginning “approval by the President,” he
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
asked the board to change the period to a comma and insert the words, “consistent with the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board of Governors’ Tuition Policy.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The committee recommended the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Across the board tuition increases for all students based on the increase in the
Consumer Price Index of 2.1%;
Additional increases for graduate students;
Increases associated with the reclassification of East Carolina University to a
Doctoral II institution;
Non-resident increases at UNC Asheville to reflect peer comparisons;
Requests for increases in professional and graduate programs at North Carolina State
University, UNC Chapel Hill, and UNC Wilmington;
Additional increases of $300 in each of the next two years for all students at North
Carolina State University and UNC Chapel Hill in response to the request from those
campuses;
Increases of $150 (gross) in each of the next two years for East Carolina University
and UNC Charlotte in response to the request from those campuses; and
Increases in resident tuition of $120 in 2000-2001; and $115 in 2001-2002, and
increases in non-resident tuition of $200 in 2000-2001 and $200 in 2001-2002 at
UNC Wilmington in response to the request from that campus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On behalf of the committee, Mr. Wilson moved that the Board of Governors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approve the 2000-2001 Supplemental Budget Request establishing tuition rates for the 2000-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 academic year and that it be forwarded to the Governor and the General Assembly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Aldridge seconded the motion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the discussion that followed, Mr. Souza noted that in the workshop on the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
preceding day there was confusion regarding whether the campus initiated tuition increases were
|
|
|
|
|
|
calculated the same across the five campuses. Mr. Souza proffered a friendly amendment to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Wilson and the Committee on Budget and Finance to ensure the consistent application of the
|
|
|
|
|
tuition increases across all five campuses (ECU, NCSU, UNCCH, UNCC, and UNCW),
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
meaning they would be exclusive of the inflationary increases the board discussed. Mr. Wilson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stated that, without objection from any member of the Budget and Finance Committee,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Souza’s comment would be accepted as a friendly amendment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|