Introduction

Taking a Good Look at Instructional Technology (TAGLIT) is a set of assessments and reports designed to help school personnel understand the current status of technology use in their schools.  TAGLIT includes surveys for school technology leaders, teachers and students.  During January 2001 our school completed a TAGLIT assessment.

School Technology Leaders: Dr. Barbara Holland Chapman, Principal, and Christopher G. Harris, Technology Specialist, completed TAGLIT for School Technology Leaders. 

Teachers: Forty-four teachers (100 percent of the certified instructional staff based at New Hope) completed TAGLIT for Teachers.

This page provides a summary of some of the findings from TAGLIT, a list of some of the strengths of our school technology program and an action plan that details an area for further work. Although hardware, software and connectivity are important elements of a school technology program, they are not the focus of this page. Elements such as planning, student use, professional development and community involvement receive attention here.

Current Status

TAGLIT results are presented on a 4-point developmental scale.

1. Embarking Getting started
2. Progressing Making some effort and showing some progress
3. Emerging Making considerable effort and showing considerable progress
4. Transforming Transforming the way teaching and learning take place

Schools can be at one stage in some aspects of school technology use, and at other stages in different aspects. Overall, based on TAGLIT and informal data, our school is at the Progressing-Emerging Stage. Some indicators that we are at the Progressing-Emerging Stage are:

 

 

 

Strengths

Some strengths of our school technology program include:

<strength>

<strength>

Areas for Work

Some areas of our school technology program that need more work include:

<area for work>

<area for work>

Action Plan

Area for Attention Professional Development through Student Use.
Action or Objective To have every grade level team develop one curriculum unit using at least one application.
Rationale Teachers' open-ended answers indicate they need and want more staff development related to classroom applications of technology; however, they see sufficient time for staff development and classroom implementation as a significant stumbling block.  Other survey data indicate wide ranges of teacher skill, of technology use in the classroom, and of time spent in staff development.  Working in teams, focusing on the integration of technology, will allow teachers to learn from one another's individual areas of expertise.  We will do this during one faculty meeting a month and during the weekly planning times when teachers are already working together to develop common units.,  This approach addresses concerns regarding teachers' need to learn, the desire for applications in the classroom, and limited time for staff development and classroom implementation.
TAGLIT Data Supporting Need for Work in this Area

<graph a5q4>

Literature Supporting Need for Work in this Area

Planning Into Practice:
Chapter 3, Integrating Technology into the Curriculum
Chapter 4, Professional Development Planning

Principal Connections:
ACOT Continuums -- entry-adoption-adaptation- appropriation-invention
(1) Survey -- teacher's self assessment of level of use 
(2) Classroom observation form -- assessment of level of technology implementation in classroom

Activities and Responsibilities
What Who Start End
Write action plan into School Improvement Plan Principal May 2001 May 2001
At first faculty meeting:
     Explain units/projects
     Introduce & administer ACOT surveys
               self-assessment
               classroom observation
     Allow sufficient time to begin planning for development of units		 Grade Chairs
Teachers
Tech. Specs.		 Aug 2001 Aug 2001
Grade level teams & technology specialists meet to plan units (weekly in grade level meetings, once a month in faculty meeting) Teachers Aug 2001 Dec 2001
Units implemented in every classroom Grade Level Teams Nov 2002 Dec 2001
Units presented at faculty meetings Grade Level Teams Jan 2002 Feb 2002
Units presented a tfamily technology nights Grade Level Teams Jan 2002 Feb 2002
Readminister ACOT surveys Teacher
Tech. Specs.
Principal		 Jan 2002 Jan 2002
Readminister ACOT surveys Teacher
Tech. Specs.
Principal		 May 2002 May 2002
Evaluation

We will know our objective has been accomplished when <a5q8>

Supporting Resources

Resource Name URL
Brief Annotation

Resource Name URL
Brief Annotation

Home l Participants l Class Page

last modified: 04/26/01